2020 was the first time in known history that the healthy global populace was imprisoned in their homes, forced to obey the machinations of state-enforced by the police and the army in some countries. Humanity allowed to exercise (this had its parameters in some countries from not being able to leave their properties to be able to travel freely within a radius of their homes to go to natural areas as long as they kept two meters apart) and go to the supermarkets to get groceries, and only those designated ‘essential services’ were allowed to work outside of their homes. The consequence of this on the global economy and the subsequent economies of global nations has been catastrophic, while a small handful of individuals have increased their wealth in what would have taken years, was compounded into weeks and months. That, in itself, should raise some questions from the critical thinking mind. Was that by design? Or was it an opportunity that they pounced on to vacuum up the small/medium-sized businesses that will never reopen due to the lockdowns, expanding their monopolies on the global economic markets?
The data is in now, the science is so blatant that the Imperial College and Dr. Neil Fergusson’s computer models (computers are tools, you put shit in, you get shit out… let’s not blame them for the exaggerated figures, it’s a human error) were so completely ridiculous, that it resembles a gong show, with the only way to keep the narrative being parroted by Gates Foundation shills is to censor EVERYONE who shows that the emperor is wearing no clothes. The methodology enforced by China of lockdowns on its populace had nothing to do with health. Let’s look at what was happening in Wuhan before the city was locked down in late 2019.
In July 2019, large numbers of riot police were sent into Wuhan as days of protesting against the building of an incinerator project in the city. The police forced shop owners to close at 6 pm so that protestors could be rounded up rather than run and hide in the stores, this happening for days on end reported The New York Times. There was no correlation between this event and the Hong Kong democracy protests which began in June that same year, another place where protesting was smashed by enforced and brutal lockdowns with enormous economic consequences. Later in the year, the first cases of the viral infection were recorded and in January 2020 the first of the global lockdowns began in Wuhan to curb the spread of the contagion. Is it a coincidence that the Rockefeller Foundation released a document in 2010, Rockefeller Foundation released a document called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”, to which I will quote,
The United States’ initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions.[…]To protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.’
If that makes you squirm in your seat, then Matthew Maavak, whose brilliant piece of investigative journalism left no stone unturned, wrote in an article for Modern Diplomacy,
‘In October 2019, a pandemic simulation exercise called Event 201 – a collaborative effort between Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – concluded that a hypothetical new coronavirus may end up killing at least 65 million people worldwide within 18 months of an outbreak.’
In a city with some of the worst air pollution on the planet, where respiratory diseases were commonplace, and the rollout of 5G which correlates to the appearance of COVID, there are more questions than there are currently answers. What we do know is that with the advent of lockdowns in Wuhan, the civil unrest that took place in the middle of the year vanished, setting a precedent for Hong Kong. The Rockefeller Foundation document released in 2010 has been a guidebook for strategic measures for this scenario. Event 201 in November 2019, was timely as the ‘pandemic’ arrived. Setting out the measures that would be taken to reset the world in the less than one percent’s desired outcome of Agenda 2030, making it Agenda 2020. China’s violation of human rights went to new extremes, and they developed a computer facial recognition system that recognises masked people with 90 percent accuracy, with an app that decides whether someone is contagion risk and therefore allowed into shopping malls, transport hubs, and public spaces. Its track and trace went gangbusters. The flow of information within the country contrary to the governments has been stemmed to the point that those who challenge it ‘vanish’. Mia Swart wrote for AlJazeera, in March 2020, ‘The Chinese human rights lawyer, Chen Qiushi, was taken away on February 7 and apparently “put under quarantine” for 24 days. There is no publicly available information on his situation. Quishi became well known for his coverage of the Hong Kong protests as well as the coronavirus outbreak.’
Although the rest of the planet is not reportedly taking some of the measures that the Chinese government is in regards to violating human rights to the point where they no longer exist, there are some honourable exceptions, California, New York, Michigan, Victoria states, Singapore just to name a handful. The beginning of the Hunger Games Society is here. Like it or not. Do we acquiesce to its arrival and imposition or rise to crush it?
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/05/world/asia/wuhan-china-protests.html Protests in Wuhan July, 2019
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52975934 Did SARS-Cov2 (if it exists) appear as early as August in Wuhan?
https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2020/10/23/covid-19-lockdowns-are-in-lockstep-with-the-great-reset/ Matthew Maavak. This the one of the most comprehensive and accomplished pieces of research and data compiled into a opinion piece I’ve read. Astonishing. A MUST READ.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/3/12/how-the-coronavirus-has-deepened-human-rights-abuses-in-china If it’s happening here, the less than 1% want it to be everywhere… globally
https://retail.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/wuhan-rent-protest-shows-unrest-brewing-in-china-after-lockdown/75090854 The aftermath of the lockdowns in Wuhan… small businesses destroyed… cui bono?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/21/china-is-using-covid-19-throttle-hong-kongs-pro-democracy-movement/ Awfully convenient.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/02/chinas-reaction-to-the-coronavirus-outbreak-violates-human-rights Straight out of the Rockefeller Foundation 2010 playbook